Nyc Casino Voter Referendum Wording Challenged by Attorney
A New York State casino referendum for voters has one attorney questioning the ballot’s wording november
In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote on a referendum that would allow several casino that is new to be built throughout the state. But if one Brooklyn attorney is successful, that referendum will be halted due to language into the ballot question he claims violates state law.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum features a quantity of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposition in an unmistakably positive light. For example, the question mentions ‘promoting job growth, increasing aid to schools and permitting regional governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was approved by hawaii Board of Elections in July.
But now, attorney Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York law. Based on case filed in the nyc State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the State Constitution’s prohibition on the employment of public money in the aid of ‘private undertakings.’
‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you can’t use public cash to sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the one that is only has had up issues with the language within the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also see it as one-sided, and groups that are religious also noted the language used when telling parishioners to consider social ills that could attend the advertised benefits of casino expansion. Read More